Diversification: Why It's the Only Free Lunch in Investing
How spreading money across different, imperfectly-correlated assets reduces risk without necessarily reducing expected return.
Diversification is often called the only "free lunch" in investing, a phrase attributed to Nobel laureate Harry Markowitz. The idea is that combining assets that don't move in perfect lockstep can reduce a portfolio's overall volatility without necessarily reducing its expected long-run return — something that sounds almost too good to be true, but follows directly from the mathematics of how variance combines across correlated and uncorrelated assets.
The key mechanism is correlation: when two assets are less than perfectly correlated, their combined volatility is lower than the simple weighted average of their individual volatilities. If stocks and bonds each swing significantly on their own, but tend not to swing in the same direction at the same time, a blended stock-and-bond portfolio will tend to have a smoother ride than either asset alone, even though it still captures a meaningful share of stocks' long-run growth.
Diversification does not mean owning as many different things as possible — it means owning things that behave differently from one another. A portfolio of ten different large-cap US growth stock funds is not meaningfully diversified, because all ten are likely to move together during a market downturn. A portfolio of US stocks, international stocks, bonds, gold, and real estate is diversified across genuinely different return drivers, even though it holds fewer distinct funds.
Every strategy on this site is, at its core, a different bet on how much diversification to pursue and across which asset classes. The Permanent Portfolio and All Weather Portfolio push diversification the furthest, spreading risk across four or five distinct return drivers. The Warren Buffett Portfolio pushes it the least, concentrating almost entirely in one asset class (US large-cap stocks) on the belief that its long-run growth more than compensates for the lack of diversification. Neither approach is objectively "correct" — the right amount of diversification depends on an individual investor's risk tolerance, time horizon, and ability to stay disciplined through a large drawdown.
Based on historical data. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This site is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.