Margarita Portfolio
Created by Bogleheads community
Three equal slices — stocks, bonds, and gold — for a simple all-weather tilt.
Current Allocation
| US Total Market | 34% |
| US Total Bond Market | 33% |
| Gold | 33% |
How This Strategy Maps to ETFs
Performance: 25.8-Year Backtest
Data for Gold starts 2000. Simulation covers 25.8 years.
$10,000 initial investment → $56,359
Annual Returns
2000–2013
| '00 | '01 | '02 | '03 | '04 | '05 | '06 | '07 | '08 | '09 | '10 | '11 | '12 | '13 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3 | +3 | -3 | +6 | +6 | +8 | -1 | +13 | -12 | +18 | +17 | +14 | +4 | -1 |
2014–2026
| '14 | '15 | '16 | '17 | '18 | '19 | '20 | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +8 | -5 | +11 | +13 | 0 | +17 | +15 | +5 | -4 | +9 | +21 | +30 | +0 |
Key Metrics
What is it?
The Margarita Portfolio is a Bogleheads-community strategy that splits a portfolio into three roughly equal parts: US stocks, investment-grade bonds, and gold. The playful name evokes a cocktail with three ingredients — and like the drink, the portfolio is deliberately simple: no international equities, no REITs, no factor tilts, just three distinct return drivers at one-third each.
The philosophy
The idea is to combine the Boglehead preference for low-cost index funds with a permanent gold allocation as an inflation and crisis hedge — similar in spirit to Harry Browne's Permanent Portfolio, but without long-term bonds or cash, and with a larger equity slice. By keeping all three sleeves at equal weight through rebalancing, the investor systematically trims whichever asset has run ahead and adds to whichever has lagged, without needing to forecast which will perform best next.
How it works
The US total market sleeve (34%) captures broad domestic equity growth across all company sizes and sectors. The total bond market sleeve (33%) provides stability, income, and a partial buffer during equity downturns. The gold sleeve (33%) acts as a portfolio hedge — historically performing well during inflation spikes, currency concerns, and periods of geopolitical stress when both stocks and bonds can struggle simultaneously.
Who is it for?
This strategy suits investors who want radical simplicity with a built-in inflation hedge, but find the Permanent Portfolio's four equal slices (including long bonds and cash) too conservative or complex. It fits a moderate risk tolerance and medium-to-long time horizon — more growth-oriented than the Permanent Portfolio thanks to its 34% equity weight, but still meaningfully more defensive than a 60/40 thanks to the one-third gold allocation.
Key strengths & trade-offs
Its strength is elegant three-fund simplicity with a dedicated inflation hedge that a standard 60/40 completely lacks — gold has historically provided positive returns during some of the worst periods for stocks and bonds together. Its trade-off is no international diversification (the entire equity sleeve is US-only), gold's long stretches of zero yield and occasional multi-year underperformance, and a 66% allocation to non-equity assets that will lag during sustained stock bull markets.
Historical performance in context
The Margarita Portfolio's one-third gold allocation gave it a very different crisis profile from a plain 60/40: gold's resilience in 2008 and its strength during the inflationary stretch of 2022 repeatedly offset weakness in stocks and bonds, keeping drawdowns moderate. The cost showed during gold's flat 2013-2018 years and long equity bull markets, when a third of the portfolio sitting in a zero-yield metal caused it to lag stock-heavy strategies.
Common variations
A common tweak is swapping the US-only stock sleeve for a globally diversified fund to add international diversification the base recipe lacks. Some investors trim gold toward 10-20% and add bonds or TIPS, edging toward the Permanent Portfolio. Others implement gold with a physically backed fund like GLD. It is a simple, inflation-aware lazy portfolio at heart.
Risk Level
Rebalancing
annual
Number of Assets
3
Best For
Long-term investors wanting a smoother ride than all-equity
Before using this allocation
- • Match the strategy's drawdown history to the amount of loss you could tolerate without abandoning the plan.
- • Check whether its stock, bond, international, and inflation-sensitive sleeves address the risks that matter for your time horizon.
- • Compare the same historical period and rebalancing rule against alternatives before changing a target allocation.
Related reading
2026-07-27
Understanding TLT and Long-Term Bonds in Modern Portfolios
A deep dive into how TLT functions as a hedge, its role in risk-parity strategies, and the considerations for investors managing interest rate sensitivity.
2026-07-20
The 1970s Inflation Lesson for Today’s Asset Allocation
Analyzing the 1970s stagflation reveals why modern portfolio diversification requires more than just a simple split between stocks and bonds.
2026-07-19
Maximum Drawdown: Understanding Portfolio Risk
Learn what maximum drawdown means for your portfolio and why it's crucial for evaluating investment strategies and asset mixes.
2026-07-18
Navigating Retirement Income: Sequence Risk and Inflation
Retirees face dual threats: market downturns early in retirement (sequence risk) and rising inflation eroding purchasing power. Learn how asset allocation helps.
2026-07-16
Real Assets and Inflation: A Portfolio Reality Check
Exploring the role of inflation-sensitive assets like gold, TIPS, and REITs in modern portfolios as of July 2026. Do they actually protect your purchasing power?
2026-07-11
Inflation Hedges: When Commodities and TIPS Actually Work
Do commodities, gold, or TIPS deserve a spot in your portfolio? We look at the role of inflation-sensitive assets and why they often frustrate investors.
2026-07-05
Gold vs. TIPS: Portfolio Protection in July 2026
Analyzing the roles of Gold and TIPS in modern portfolios as of July 2026. How these inflation hedges differ in their response to interest rate shifts.
Or see the growth of $10,000 in the Margarita Portfolio over the past 30 years.
Hypothetical historical performance based on backtested data. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This site is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Full disclaimer